| Criteria |
Weight |
Bad (1–25) |
Good (26–50) |
Distinction (51–75) |
Excellence (76–100) |
| Background & Problem Statement |
15% |
Problem is unclear or not relevant to strategic issues |
Clear problem at unit/department level |
Based on directorate/BU needs and linked to digital/knowledge transformation |
Strategic problem supporting the intelligent society and relevant at BINUS Group/national level |
| Collaboration & Orchestrated Plan |
25% |
Plan is not feasible and shows no collaboration |
Clear plan but still unit-based, no prototype |
Prototype available with cross-functional collaboration, not fully ready for implementation |
Implementation-ready prototype demonstrating orchestrated knowledge across units/ecosystem |
| Risk & Governance Readiness |
10% |
Risks are not identified |
Risks identified but mitigation is weak |
Clear and realistic risk identification and mitigation |
Strong, measurable risk, governance, and sustainability plan |
| Strategic & Impact Potential |
25% |
Output is unclear |
Impact limited to unit/department |
Impact at directorate/BU level with business/operational contribution |
Impact at BINUS Group level with national/international contribution potential |
| Novelty & Value Creation |
25% |
Already exists with minor improvement |
Moderate improvement from existing solution |
Significant improvement creating new value |
New to BINUS Group/national level and creates sustainable strategic value |
