Continuous Innovation Award Rubric

This rubric has changed compared to last year

Criteria Weight Score (1-100)​
Bad (125​) Good (2650)​ Great (51-75) Excellence (76-100​)
Output 25% Used in internal unit Used in more than 1 unit Used in all Binus Group​

(Internal)

National / International ​

(External)

Implementation 30% Slightly implemented Partially implemented Mostly implemented Fully implemented
User Feedback

(stakeholder/user satisfactory result)

20% Unsuitable measurement method(s) There is already a way to measure the outcome, but the measurement has not yet been implemented, description without evidence There are outcomes reported but the way they are measured is unclear. The team report data of measured outcomes of the innovation
Commercial Viability/ Replicability  15% Has barely commercial potential, does not tackle practical aspects of production Has little commercial potential, barely tackily practical aspects of production Has commercial potential, addresses aspects of effective design and production, not of fast execution Has a commercial potential, addresses aspects of effective design and production, applicable for fast execution and market penetration
Lesson Learned 10% Unclear explanation of lesson learned Vague explanation lesson learned Clear explanation of lesson learned Clear explanation of lesson learned with mitigate strategies